MILLER et al v. ORNDORFF et al
Plaintiff: XAVIER M. MILLER and N. ARNOLD
Defendant: T. STEVENS, RICHARD BROWN, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON, FARLEY S. ORNDORFF and C. HOLCOMB
Case Number: 2:2019cv00591
Filed: December 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Documents for Service by IDOC - re #9 Order on Motion, #10 Jury Demand. (KAA)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiff XAVIER M. MILLER. (KAA)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Denying as Unnecessary #5 Motion to Amend Complaint. The clerk is directed to redocket the motion, dkt. #5 , as a demand for jury trial on all issues and serve a copy to each of the defendants. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/10/2020. (KAA)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Documents for Service by IDOC - re #1 Complaint, #6 Entry, #7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk. (KAA)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon (1) Sergeant C. Holcomb, (2) Officer N. Arnold, and (3) Officer T. Stevens. (KAA)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF PROCESS - Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. The assessment of an initial partial filing fee is waived. The clerk is directed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendants (1) Sergeant C. Holcomb, (2) Officer N. Arnold, and (3) Officer T. Stevens in the manner specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). All other claims are dismissed. The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that all other defendants have been terminated. If Mr. Miller believes he asserted claims not discussed in Part II(C), he shall have through February 4, 2020, to notify the Court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/8/2020.(KAA)
December 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Amend Complaint in order to include Jury Trial, filed by Plaintiff XAVIER M. MILLER. (KAA)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff N. ARNOLD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account; Offender Trust System Transaction Inquiry). (AKH)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, C. HOLCOMB, XAVIER M. MILLER, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON, FARLEY S. ORNDORFF, T. STEVENS, filed by N. ARNOLD. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-26). (AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLER et al v. ORNDORFF et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. STEVENS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FARLEY S. ORNDORFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. HOLCOMB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XAVIER M. MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: N. ARNOLD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?