SCHREANE v. WATSON
| CLARENCE D. SCHREANE |
| T. J. WATSON |
| 2:2019cv00610 |
| December 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The United States shall have through March 9, 2020, in which to answer the allegations of the petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, and the petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) calendar days after service of the answer in which to reply. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/7/2020.(KAA)
|
|
Filing 8
RECEIPT #IP068193 for habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by petitioner. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Sara Varner on behalf of Petitioner CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Varner, Sara)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Entry and Order to Show Cause - The petitioner shall have through January 24, 2020, to pay the $5.00 filing fee. The clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to the United States Attorney for this District. The Indiana Federal Community Defenders Office, Inc. ("IFCD") is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner in this action. The IFCD shall have through January 3, 2020, in which to appear. The United States shall have through February 3, 2020, in which to answer the allegations of the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, and the petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) calendar days after service of the answer in which to reply. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/27/2019. (KAA)
|
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(REO)
|
|
Filing 2
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM of law in Support, re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Affidavits in support and case law, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(REO)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(REO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SCHREANE v. WATSON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CLARENCE D. SCHREANE | |
| Represented By: | Sara Varner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. J. WATSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
