ROPER v. BROWN
| TALON ROPER |
| RICHARD BROWN |
| 2:2020cv00031 |
| January 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order Amending Disciplinary Case Number - Petitioner Roper's motion to correct order, dkt #8 , is granted. Although there was another disciplinary case number referenced in the habeas petition, Mr. Roper has now clarified that the disciplinary case number at issue in this case is WVE 19-11-0068. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/16/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Correct Order, filed by Petitioner TALON ROPER. (AAS) |
| Filing 7 ***PLEASE DISREGARD - FILED IN WRONG CASE*** Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by RICHARD BROWN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 4/16/2020. (Arthur, David) Modified on 3/16/2020 (KAA). |
| Filing 6 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by RICHARD BROWN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 4/16/2020. (Arthur, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Arthur on behalf of Respondent RICHARD BROWN. (Arthur, David) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Talon Ropers petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number WVE 19-11-0036 on December 3, 2019. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted.( Show Cause Response due by 3/5/2020.) The petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/23/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner TALON ROPER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TALON ROPER. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #2 Exhibit B - Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, #3 Exhibit Appeal Denial Letters).(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ROPER v. BROWN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TALON ROPER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RICHARD BROWN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
