BECKMAN v. BROWN
| CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN |
| RICHARD BROWN |
| 2:2020cv00232 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Christopher Beckman's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his conviction in prison disciplinary case WVD 19-09-0062. See dkt. #6 . The amended petition is therefore dismissed. Rather than dismiss the action and enter final judgment, the Court will offer Mr. Beckman a final opportunity to amend his petition. If Mr. Beckman believes he was convicted in WVD 19-09-0062 without one of the four due process rights identified above, he shall have through July 24, 2020, to file a second amended petition. The clerk is directed to include a form petition with Mr. Beckman's copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Petition form)(KAA)
|
| Filing 6 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
|
Filing 5
ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION - Christopher Beckmans motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Mr. Beckman shall have through June 19, 2020, to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that specifically identifies which disciplinary action he wishes to challenge. The clerk is directed to include a blank form petition with Mr. Beckmans copy of this Entry. In the amended petition, Mr. Beckman shall address only those facts and arguments for relief that apply to the specified disciplinary action. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 5/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Petition Form) (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate of Trust Fund Account). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BECKMAN v. BROWN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RICHARD BROWN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER BECKMAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
