SCRUGGS v. ALDEN et al
| CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS |
| BLAKE MCDONALD, JAMES ALDEN and ERIC DRADA |
| 2:2020cv00288 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Order directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT against the plaintiff and for the defendants. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/27/2020.(KAA)
|
|
Filing 8
Order Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Mr. Scruggs has not shown cause why his complaint should not have been dismissed because his claims is barred by the Indiana statute of limitations. Because the claim is barred, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This action is dismissed on this basis. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now enter. Mr. Scruggs is reminded that he is now subject to the three-strike provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/27/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Order to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
|
Filing 6
Order Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Screening and Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - Mr. Scruggs's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs (in forma pauperis), dkt. #3 , is granted because the Court finds that he does not have the assets or means to pay even an initial partial filing fee. The complaint is therefore dismissed pursuant to 1915A. Mr. Scruggs shall have through July 9, 2020, in which to show cause why the complaint should not have been dismissed and instead allowed to proceed. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/12/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account; Offender Trust System Offender Detail Inquiry; Affidavit of Special Circumstances). (AKH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JAMES ALDEN, BLAKE MCDONALD, filed by CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit WVCF Offender Grievance Response Report). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
