SYKES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BRYANT SYKES |
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
2:2020cv00316 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Doris L Pryor |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ENTRY DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - ORDER denying #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This habeas petition was dismissed as a duplicative action on July 6, 2020. Dkt. #5 . The petitioner's identical action proceeds under case number 2:20-cv-00313-JMS- MJD. See Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/4/2020. (KAA) |
Filing 7 Submission of Exhibit to #6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner BRYANT SYKES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner BRYANT SYKES. (AAS) |
Filing 5 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court having this day issued its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/6/2020.(LBT) |
Filing 4 ENTRY DISMISSING DUPLICATIVE ACTION - In this habeas action filed on June 19, 2020, petitioner Bryant Sykes challenges his disciplinary conviction on February 25, 2020, a Class B violation of sexual contact. Dkt. #2 . This action is identical to the action filed on June 18, 2020, case number 2:20-cv-00313-JMS-MJD, seeking habeas relief based on the same disciplinary case. Mr. Sykes' habeas petition filed on June 18, 2020, shall proceed and this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/6/2020.(LBT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by BRYANT SYKES. (No fee paid with this filing).(AKH) |
Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRYANT SYKES located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRYANT SYKES to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SYKES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: BRYANT SYKES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.