SWANN v. SEVIER et al
TERRANCE SWANN |
MARK SEVIER, ASSISTANT WARDEN OF OPERATIONS FOR NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVIS |
2:2020cv00320 |
June 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42:1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. Copy provided to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TERRANCE SWANN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TMC) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff TERRANCE SWANN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(TMC) Modified on 6/22/2020 to edit text (TMC). (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/22/2020) (TMC). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASSISTANT WARDEN OF OPERATIONS FOR NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVIS, MARK SEVIER, filed by TERRANCE SWANN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(TMC) (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/22/2020) (TMC). (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/22/2020) (TMC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.