EMERY v. WARDEN
Petitioner: TONY E. EMERY
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 2:2020cv00322
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the Petitioners motion - The Respondent shall have to and including November 19, 2020, to file its response to the 2255 motion. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/13/2020. (AAS)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to November 19, 2020 in which to respond to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian) Modified on 8/13/2020 - corrected title (RSF).
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Reitz on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Reitz, Brian)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel - The Indiana Federal Community Defenders Office, Inc. (IFCD) is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner in this action. The IFCD shall have through August 10, 2020, in which to appear. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/15/2020. (KAA)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE( Show Cause Response due by 8/19/2020.) The respondent shall have until August 19, 2020, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/2/2020.(KAA)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner, TONY E. EMERY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner, TONY E. EMERY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TONY E. EMERY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Appendix containing court records from Western District of Missouri, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EMERY v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Represented By: Brian L. Reitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TONY E. EMERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?