WHITE-BEY et al v. CARTER et al
| DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY and DONYALL E. WHITE, ESTATE |
| STAFF MEMBERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES LLC, WILLIAMS and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. |
| 2:2020cv00331 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dkts. #3 and #8 , are granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Three Dollars and Zero Cents ($3.00). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through September 10, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/10/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JRB) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through August 10, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY. (REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ROBERT E. CARTER, JR, STAFF MEMBERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES LLC, WILLIAMS, filed by DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY, DONYALL E. WHITE, ESTATE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Grievance documents)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
