TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
| JOSHUA TAYLOR |
| FISCHER, CUPP, T. DAVIS, RANSY, HARDBALL, CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, HALL, T. LITTLEJOHN, VIRES, R. BROWN, K. GILMORE and POWERS |
| 2:2020cv00375 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Documents to be Sent via Electronic Notice - re #1 Complaint, #9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #8 Order Electronic Notice to IDOC. Wabash Valley Correctional Facility (KAA) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon: 1) Warden R. Brown; 2) Warden K. Gilmore; 3) Warden T. Littlejohn; 4) Officer Davis; 5) Officer Hardball; 6) Sergeant Sanders; 7) Sergeant Hall; 8) Officer Cupp; and 9) Officer Vires. (KAA) Modified on 9/18/2020 to replace document with corrected dated (KAA). (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/18/2020) (KAA). |
Filing 8
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT, DISMISSING DEFICIENT CLAIMS, AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS - This summary of claims includes all the viable claims identified by the Court. All other claims are dismissed. If Mr. Taylor believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through October 9, 2020, to identify those claims. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Warden R. Brown, Warden K. Gilmore, Warden T. Littlejohn, Officer Davis, Officer Hardball, Lieutenant Fischer, Sergeant Sanders, Sergeant Hall, Officer Cupp, and Officer Vires in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). The clerk is directed to terminate Officer Ransy, L.T. Fischer, and Nurse Powers as defendants on the docket. SEE ORDER. Distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/18/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JOSHUA TAYLOR. (JRB) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee when able. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/6/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOSHUA TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through August 28, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. BROWN, CUPP, T. DAVIS, FISCHER, K. GILMORE, HALL, HARDBALL, T. LITTLEJOHN, POWERS, RANSY, CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, VIRES, filed by JOSHUA TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
