ESSEX v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
| ZACHERY ESSEX |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA |
| 2:2020cv00447 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 11/27/2020. (Arthur, David) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP070924 for Habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (REO) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Arthur on behalf of Respondent ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. (Arthur, David) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by Petitioner ZACHERY ESSEX. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 10/15/2020. The petitioner shall have through October 2, 2020, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/3/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ZACHERY ESSEX. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Certificate and cover pages)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ZACHERY ESSEX located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ZACHERY ESSEX to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ESSEX v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ZACHERY ESSEX | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA | |
| Represented By: | David A. Arthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
