SALTER v. WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
Plaintiff: TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II and GODLY DASYPUL
Defendant: WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
Case Number: 2:2020cv00456
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2020 Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters final judgment. The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/20/2020.(KAA)
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - The action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to pay the filing fee. This dismissal counts as a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (g). Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/20/2020.(KAA)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESOLVE FILING FEE AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT - The plaintiff shall have through October 2, 2020, to either pay the $400.00 filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Salter's complaint, dkt. #1 , is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Mr. Salter shall have through October 2, 2020, to file an amended complaint that resolves the deficiencies discussed in this Entry. The clerk is directed to include a civil rights complaint form and a form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with Mr. Salter's copy of this Order. See Order. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 9/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Complaint Form, #2 IFP Form)(KAA)
September 4, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
September 3, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS, filed by TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SALTER v. WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GODLY DASYPUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?