BYRD v. SMITH et al
Plaintiff: STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR.
Defendant: THOMAS WELLINGTON, JODEANA RANEY, DANITA REED, KEVIN GILMORE, BRITTNEE SMITH and FRANK LITTLEJOHN
Case Number: 2:2020cv00504
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2020 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Special Circumstances re Filing Fee by STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR. (AAS)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PAYMENT OF INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE - The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twelve Dollars and Four Cents ($12.04). The plaintiff shall have through November 17, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. See Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/16/2020. (KAA)
October 16, 2020 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #6 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS)
October 14, 2020 Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account)(AAS)
October 2, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through November 2, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR. (AKH)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KEVIN GILMORE, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, JODEANA RANEY, DANITA REED, BRITTNEE SMITH, THOMAS WELLINGTON, filed by STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11). (AKH)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BYRD v. SMITH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS WELLINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JODEANA RANEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANITA REED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEVIN GILMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRITTNEE SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANK LITTLEJOHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHEN A. BYRD, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?