BALTIMORE v. WARDEN
| LAVERN BALTIMORE |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2020cv00505 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters final judgment. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/20/2020.(KAA) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION - Mr. Baltimore's petition is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. His motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is DENIED because the motion shows that he has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee required for a habeas corpus petition. Final judgment shall now enter. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/20/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner LAVERN BALTIMORE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account). (AKH) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LAVERN BALTIMORE. (No fee paid with this filing).(AKH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by LAVERN BALTIMORE located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by LAVERN BALTIMORE to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BALTIMORE v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LAVERN BALTIMORE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
