MITCHELL v. VANVLEET
Plaintiff: RASHAD DALE MITCHELL
Defendant: RANDALL VANVLEET
Case Number: 2:2020cv00515
Filed: October 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Doris L Pryor
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. The Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A in a separate, future Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/28/2020. (KAA)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address for RASHAD DALE MITCHELL, CIC 5124 West Reformatory Road, Pendleton, IN 46064. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (AAS)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RASHAD DALE MITCHELL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit)(AAS)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address for RASHAD DALE MITCHELL, CIC Pendleton, IN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (AAS)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by RASHAD DALE MITCHELL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through November 6, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2020: #1 Form motion for IFP) (MEH).
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RANDALL VANVLEET, filed by RASHAD DALE MITCHELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MITCHELL v. VANVLEET
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RASHAD DALE MITCHELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDALL VANVLEET
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?