WILLIAMS v. BROWN et al
| SHAWN WILLIAMS |
| C. HOLCOMB, C. NICHOLSON and RICHARD BROWN |
| 2:2020cv00531 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/21/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, SHAWN WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Special Circumstances, Transaction History)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, C. HOLCOMB, and C. NICHOLSON, filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
