LINTZ et al v. CARTER et al
| JERRY SNYDER, DAKOTA LINTZ, XAVIER MILLER and ANTONIO TOWNSEND |
| SMALLS, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and FRANK VANIHEL |
| 2:2020cv00589 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Entry Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiffs shall have through January 8, 2021, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that they lack the financial ability to do so. (See Order.) Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/22/2020.(RSF)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff's via US mail. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ROBERT E. CARTER, JR, DAKOTA LINTZ, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, XAVIER MILLER, SMALLS, JERRY SNYDER, FRANK VANIHEL, filed by ANTONIO TOWNSEND. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IDOC Correction Restriction Form). (AKH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
