CAULDER v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL et al
| BRENT CAULDER, JR. |
| VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL and DAVID WEDDING |
| 2:2020cv00594 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRENT CAULDER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 4
Order Transferring Action to the Southern District of Indiana-Evansville Division (Case Transferred to 3:20-cv-261-RLY-MPB). SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/12/2020.(JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRENT CAULDER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL, DAVID WEDDING, filed by BRENT CAULDER, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
