SCOTT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
| TODD WATSON SCOTT |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2020cv00597 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
| Filing 11 RECEIPT #IP071856 for partial filing fee in the amount of $66.83, paid by plaintiff. (AKH) |
Filing 10
Order Granting Motion for Information, Denying Motion for Counsel without Prejudice, and Directing Further Proceedings - Mr. Scott's motion for information regarding service, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the Court will serve the defendants once it has screened his complaint. However, Mr. Scott's complaint will not be screened until he has paid his $66.83 initial partial filing fee; he shall have through January 15, 2021, to pay that fee or explain his inability to do so. Further, Mr. Scott has through January 15, 2021, to file an amended complaint that wil l completely replace his original complaint. Mr. Scott's motion for appointment of counsel, dkt. #8 , is denied without prejudice. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Scott a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form and a blank complaint form with his copy of this Order. Copies to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Counsel Form, #2 Complaint Form) (KAA)
|
| Filing 9 Submission of Amendment to Complaint, filed by Plaintiff TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Information Regarding Service, filed by Plaintiff TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that he is assessed an initial partial filing fee of sixty-six dollars and eighty-three cents ($66.83). Mr. Scott shall have through December 14, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to Mr. Scott and his custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/16/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TODD WATSON SCOTT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Inmate Inquiry, #2 Envelope).(AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by TODD WATSON SCOTT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
