SPARKS v. MCCARTHY
| EVE BAKER SPARKS |
| RYAN D. MCCARTHY |
| 2:2020cv00601 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by EVE BAKER SPARKS. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY served on 12/18/2020. (KAA) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY CLARIFYING DEADLINE - On December 17, 2020, the Court issued an Entry screening Plaintiff Eve Baker Sparks' Amended Complaint and directing further proceedings. Filing No. #7 . In relevant part, the Entry directs that: "If Ms. Sparks believes that additional claims were alleged in the Amended Complaint, but not identified by the Court in this Entry, she shall have until January 7, 2020 to identify those claims." Filing No. #7 at #10 . The date specified in that directive contains a scrivener's error. Accordingly, the Court CLARIFIES that Ms. Sparks shall have until January 7, 2021 to identify any additional claims that she believes were alleged in the Amended Complaint but not identified by the Court in the December 17, 2020 Entry. Nothing else in the December 17, 2020 Entry shall be affected by this clarification. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/18/2020.(KAA) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to RYAN D. MCCARTHY. (KAA) |
Filing 7
ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - At this time, the Court has not determined that the action must be dismissed and therefore the following claims shall proceed: SEE ORDER. All other claims asserted in the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. If Ms. Sparks believes that additional claims were alleged in the Amended Complaint, but not identified by the Court in this Entry, she shall have until January 7, 2020 to identify those claims. Ms. Sparks' request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. The Court DESIGNATES the Clerk to serve Defendant Ryan D. McCarthy and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of the Summons and a copy of the Amended Complaint, Filing No. #6 , by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. See Order. Distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/17/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against RYAN D. MCCARTHY, filed by EVE BAKER SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by EVE BAKER SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 4
ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Based on the foregoing, the Court makes the following rulings: 1. Ms. Sparks' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 , is GRANTED; 2. Ms. Sparks' Complaint, #1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. Ms. Sparks' Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #1 , is DENIED without prejudice. Ms. Sparks shall have until December 16, 2020 to file an Amended Complaint that addresses the issues outlined in this Order and otherwise complies with federal pleading standards. Failure to file an Amended Complaint by that date may result in dismissal of this case. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/18/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EVE BAKER SPARKS. (not signed) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) Modified on 11/16/2020 (REO). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RYAN D. MCCARTHY, filed by EVE BAKER SPARKS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SPARKS v. MCCARTHY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Debtor in possession: RYAN D. MCCARTHY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EVE BAKER SPARKS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
