WHEATLEY v. VANIHEL
| ROY WHEATLEY |
| FRANK VANIHEL |
| 2:2020cv00603 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by FRANK VANIHEL. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 2/9/2021. (Barrow, Frances) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Frances Hale Barrow on behalf of Respondent FRANK VANIHEL. (Barrow, Frances) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/1/2020. (KAA)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner ROY WHEATLEY. (LBT) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ROY WHEATLEY. (TMC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Roy Wheatley's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number WVD 20-07-0037 on July 27, 2020. The petitioner shall have through December 18, 2020, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 12/29/2020. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/17/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROY WHEATLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ROY WHEATLEY located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ROY WHEATLEY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WHEATLEY v. VANIHEL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL | |
| Represented By: | Frances Hale Barrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROY WHEATLEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
