RANDALL v. PLASSE et al
Plaintiff: DURAND M. RANDALL
Defendant: JOHN PLASSE and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Case Number: 2:2020cv00689
Filed: December 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2021 Filing 7 ENTRY granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirty-Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($32.00). He shall have through February 26, 2021, to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/25/2021. (KAA)
January 14, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Order - Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff DURAND M. RANDALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The Court cannot rule on Mr. Randall's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , because it is incomplete. Mr. Randall shall have through January 29, 2021, in which to submit a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on December 28, 2020. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Vigo County Sheriff. Otherwise, Mr. Randall must pay the $402.00 filing fee. Additionally, the clerk is directed to maintain Mr. Randall's motion under seal because it includes the name of a minor child, whom Mr. Randall should have identified only by her initials. Copies to Plaintiff and VCSO via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/30/2020.(KAA)
December 30, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
December 29, 2020 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
December 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DURAND M. RANDALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(AKH)
December 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN PLASSE, VIGO COUNTY JAIL, filed by DURAND M. RANDALL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RANDALL v. PLASSE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN PLASSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DURAND M. RANDALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?