BROADFIELD v. LAMMER et al
| BRIAN D. BROADFIELD |
| TERRE HAUTE PROPERTY OFFICER, KLEPZ, HAROLD SMITH, BRIAN LAMMER, COX, JAMES LOTZ, THOMAS WATSON, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 2:2021cv00008 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #8 MOTION FOR SERVICE OF SUMMONS - The plaintiff's motion for service of summons, dkt. #8 , is denied. The filing fee for this action has not yet been resolved as ordered, nor has the complaint been screened. Once these actions are complete, and only if the Court determines that service is proper, will the Court initiate service on the defendants. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 2/22/2021. (AAS)
|
| Filing 10 RECEIPT #IP072693 for civil filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by plaintiff. (AKH) |
| Filing 9 Submission of Proposed Summons, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN D. BROADFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Service of Summons, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN D. BROADFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JOINDER AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESOLVE FILING FEE - Mr. Broadfield's motion to join cases, dkt. #5 , is denied as moot. The Court again reminds Mr. Broadfield that he remains responsible for the $402 filing fee in this action. He shall have additional time, through March 2, 2021, to pay the filing fee or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to enclose a copy of the form Prisoner Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Full Filing Fee with Mr. Broadfield's copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Form) (JRB)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRIAN D. BROADFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Join Cases, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN D. BROADFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) Modified on 1/27/2021 (AAS). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 16, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ATTORNEY GENERAL, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, COX, KLEPZ, BRIAN LAMMER, JAMES LOTZ, HAROLD SMITH, filed by BRIAN D. BROADFIELD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
