COUSINS v. ZANTECKY et al
| ANTON COUSINS |
| WILLIAM BARR and ZANTECKY |
| 2:2021cv00048 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent ZANTECKY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Indiana Department of Correction, Offender Data, #2 Exhibit 2: Evidence Relied Upon and Findings of Fact, Parole Revocation Hearing, #3 Exhibit 3: Notice/Disposition of Parole Board, #4 Exhibit 4: myCase Search Results, #5 Exhibit 5: Cousins v. Hyatte, Miami Circuit Court, 52C01-1901-MI-000038, Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed January 9, 2019, #6 Exhibit 6: Cousins v. Hyatte, Miami Circuit Court, 52C01-1901-MI-000038, Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, and Order entered October 19, 2019, #7 Exhibit 7: Cousins v. Hyatte, Miami Circuit Court, 52C01-1901-MI-000038, Order Setting Deadline for Holding of Petitioner's Rehearing Before the Indiana Parole Board entered September 7, 2019, #8 Exhibit 8: Cousins v. Hyatte, Ind. Ct. App., No. 20A-MI-1181, Notice of Appeal filed June 4, 2020, #9 Exhibit 9: Cousins v. Hyatte, Ind. Ct. App., No. 20A-MI-1181, Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed December 7, 2020, #10 Exhibit 10: Cousins v. Hyatte, Ind. Ct. App., No. 20A-MI-1181, Order filed December 22, 2020, #11 Exhibit 11: Cousins v. Smith, S.D. Ind., Case No. 2:19-cv-00519-JPH-MJD, Petition filed October 28, 2019, #12 Exhibit 12: Cousins v. Smith, S.D. Ind., Case No. 2:19-cv-00519-JPH-MJD, Order Dismissing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability filed April 14, 2020)(Rose, Archer) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent ZANTECKY. (Rose, Archer) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Archer Riddick Randall Rose on behalf of Respondent ZANTECKY. (Rose, Archer) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - ANTON COUSINS's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number. Petitioner shall have through 2/22/2021, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his/her financial inability to do so. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 2/1/2021. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 3/4/2021. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 3/25/2021. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/20/2021.(KAA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ANTON COUSINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter).(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
