MCCULLOUGH v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL et al
| CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH |
| NURSING STAFF, VIGO COUNTY JAIL and LIZ |
| 2:2021cv00057 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as undeliverable. not at this facility #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH, 201 Cherry Street, Terre Haute, IN 47807. (AAS) Modified on 3/3/2021 - no new address reported (TMC). |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as NOT AT FACILITY. #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis sent to CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH 201 Cherry Street, Terre Haute, IN 47807. (JRB) Modified on 3/1/2021 - no new address reported (TMC). |
| Filing 8 Docket #3 and #4 resent to Plaintiff CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH at VIGO COUNTY JAIL via US Mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH, 201 Cherry Street, Terre Haute, IN. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to CHAD THOMAS MCCULLOUGH, 201 Cherry Street, Terre Haute, IN. (AAS) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Mr. McCullough's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied for the reasons discussed in Part I. His complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed in Part II. Mr. McCullough shall have through March 3, 2021, to file an amended complaint that resolves the deficiencies discussed in Part II. He shall also have through March 3, 2021, to resolve the filing fee issue as directed in Part I. If Mr. McCullough chooses to file an amended complaint, he must use the form provided by the Court, and he must include the case number associated with this action, no. 2:21-cv-00057-JRS-MJD. It will completely replace the original complaint, and it will be screened pursuant to 1915A, so it must include all defendants, claims, and factual allegations that Mr. McCullough wishes to pursue in this action. If Mr. McCullough fails to comply with these orders in the time provided, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted without further warning or opportunity to show cause and enter final judgment. The clerk is requested to include a blank civil rights complaint form with Mr. McCullough's copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Form) (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHAD MCCULLOUGH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LIZ, NURSING STAFF, VIGO COUNTY JAIL, filed by CHAD MCCULLOUGH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
