ROGERS v. FORQUER et al
| JEREMY W. ROGERS |
| MURRAY, MICHELLE, BRANDY LEEK, HARLEY CRABB and TAYLOR FORQUER |
| 2:2021cv00078 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of JEREMY W. ROGERS - Plaintiff is still obligated to pay the remainder of the three hundred and fifty dollars ($350.00) filing fee. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to facility via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 3/15/2021.(JRB)
|
| Filing 9 RECEIPT #IP072955 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $6.00, paid by plaintiff. (AKH) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JEREMY W. ROGERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Six Dollars ($6.00). The plaintiff shall have through March 4, 2021, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and his custodian. The complaint will be screened following payment of the initial partial filing fee. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/5/2021. (KAA)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JEREMY W. ROGERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Transaction history)(REO) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against HARLEY CRABB, TAYLOR FORQUER, BRANDY LEEK, MICHELLE, MURRAY, filed by JEREMY W. ROGERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
| Filing 2 Second CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JEREMY W. ROGERS located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JEREMY W. ROGERS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) Modified on 2/3/2021 (REO). |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JEREMY W. ROGERS located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JEREMY W. ROGERS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
