WINDOM v. COOKE et al
| AARON WINDOM |
| CHRISTINA COOKE, WESTVILLE DEPUTY WARDEN, J. LYTTLE and WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| 2:2021cv00107 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 5/18/2021. (Corey, David)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Corey, David)
|
|
Filing 8
**PLEASE DISREGARD - CORRECTED AT #9 ** NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Corey, David) Modified on 3/9/2021 (KAA).
|
|
Filing 7
***PLEASE DISREGARD - WRONG PETITIONER*** NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Corey, David) Modified on 3/8/2021 (KAA).
|
|
Filing 6
ENTRY granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to modify the docket so that the only respondent is the petitioner's custodian, Warden, Wabash Valley Correction Facility. All other respondents shall be terminated. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/1/2021. (KAA)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner AARON WINDOM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(AAS)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 4/6/2021. The petitioner shall have through March 24, 2021, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/23/2021.(AAS)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by AARON WINDOM. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Report of Conduct (4/17/2020), #2 Exhibit 2A - Postponement of Disciplinary Hearing, #3 Exhibit 2B - Postponement of Disciplinary Hearing, #4 Exhibit 2C - Postponement of Disciplinary Hearing, #5 Exhibit 3 - Report of Disciplinary Hearing (5/13/2020), #6 Exhibit 4A - Request for Remittance, #7 Exhibit 5 - Disciplinary Hearing Appeal (6/5/2020), #8 Exhibit 6 - Appeal Denial Letter, #9 Exhibit 7 - Disciplinary Hearing Appeal (6/5/2020), #10 Exhibit 8 - Appeal Denial Letter)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 1
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by AARON WINDOM located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by AARON WINDOM to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
