CLOWERS v. WATSON
| GEORGE CLOWERS |
| T. J. WATSON |
| 2:2021cv00172 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order Directing Clerk to Refund Overpayment - Petitioner paid the full $5.00 filing fee in this action on April 27, 2021. Dkt. 6 . Later, Elaine Pepe-Williams paid an additional $5.00 on petitioner's behalf. Dkt. 8 . Ms. Pepe-Williams has moved for a refund. That motion, dkt. #9 , is granted. The clerk is directed to issue a refund of $5.00 to Ms. Pepe-Williams. Copy to petitioner and Ms. Pepe-Williams via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 6/2/2021. (KAA)
|
| Filing 8 RECEIPT #IP074182 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Elaine Pepe-Williams on behalf of GEORGE CLOWERS. (DJH) Modified on 5/27/2021 (DJH). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, AND DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE - Mr. Clowers's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is DENIED as moot because he has paid the $5.00 filing fee for this action. The same filing includes a one-sentence request for appointment of counsel. Dkt. #2 . That request is also DENIED. Mr. Clowers has through June 17, 2021, to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Failure to meet this deadline will result in dismissal without further notice (See Order). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/26/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Refund filed by Elaine Pepe Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP073672 for Habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (REO) |
| Filing 5 Submission of Supplement to Petition Dkt. #1 , filed by Petitioner GEORGE CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by GEORGE CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner GEORGE CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GEORGE CLOWERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CLOWERS v. WATSON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: GEORGE CLOWERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. J. WATSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
