BURNETT v. BUTTS et al
Plaintiff: DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant: T. THOMPSON, SARAH HAEFNER and KEITH BUTTS
Case Number: 2:2021cv00201
Filed: April 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (AAS)
May 10, 2021 Filing 5 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Burnett remains liable for the full amount of the filing fee. However, the assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 5/10/2021. (KAA)
May 4, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
May 3, 2021 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
April 30, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certified Counselors Statement)(REO)
April 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KEITH BUTTS, SARAH HAEFNER, T. THOMPSON, filed by DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a - Report of Conduct dated 9/18/18, #2 Exhibit B - Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Disciplinary Hearing, #4 Exhibit D - Appeal Denial, #5 Exhibit T - Supporting Facts, #6 Exhibit E - 11/30/18 letter re: receipt of appeal, #7 Exhibit F - 12/16/19 letter re: dismissal of case, #8 Exhibit G - Unit Custody Review dated 10/18/18, #9 Memorandum in support of Complaint)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BURNETT v. BUTTS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. THOMPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SARAH HAEFNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?