HOLLINGSWORTH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
| SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH |
| MIKE RAINS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, TODD ROKITA d/b/a, Indiana Attorney General, ERIC HOLCOMB d/b/a, Governor, TIM PHEGLEY d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, A. MCCULLOUGH d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Sergeant #195, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, T. HARDY d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Sergeant #485, D. ANSTED d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, C/O #186, DUSHAN ZATECKY d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Warden, CHRIS WILLIAMS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Grievance Specialist, BATES d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, C/O #167, CONNIE LAWSON d/b/a, Secretary of State and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Commissioner |
| 2:2021cv00205 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - denying without prejudice #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel because it provides neither sufficient information to assess the merits of his request nor an acknowledgement of the conditions of the appointment of counsel. The clerk is directed to send the plaintiff a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form with his copy of this Order. Copies to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Counsel Form) (KAA)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #EV007394 for Partial Filing Fee fee in the amount of $12.20, paid by Shauille Hollingsworth. (JRB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twelve Dollars and Twenty Cents ($12.20). The plaintiff shall have through June 7, 2021, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/5/2021. (JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Transaction history, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. ANSTED, BATES, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR, T. HARDY, ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CONNIE LAWSON, A. MCCULLOUGH, TIM PHEGLEY, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MIKE RAINS, TODD ROKITA, CHRIS WILLIAMS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
