WRIGHT v. WATSON et al
Plaintiff: MARCUS D. WRIGHT
Defendant: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. PROSECUTOR OF SAN ANTONIO, TX and T. J. WATSON
Case Number: 2:2021cv00215
Filed: May 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Submission of Proposed Order granting Motion for Emergency Injunction, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Response to Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT, re #9 Notice of Deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (AAS)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DECLARATION of Marcus Wright in Support of re #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel by MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through July 8, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 COMPLAINT against U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. PROSECUTOR OF SAN ANTONIO, TX, T. J. WATSON, filed by MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(JRB)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF COMPLAINTAND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - To initiate a civil action, Mr. Wright must file a complaint. To initiate a civil action, Mr. Wright must file a complaint. Mr. Wright's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is DENIED because the motion does not provide the information required for the Court to determine Mr. Wright's ability to pay the filing fee for this action. Mr. Wright shall have through June 14, 2021, to pay the $402 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his inability to do so. The clerk is directed to include a blank prisoner complaint form and a blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with Mr. Wright's copy of this Order. Copies to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Complaint Form, #2 IFP Form) (KAA)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Emergency Injunction and TRO) against U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. PROSECUTOR OF SAN ANTONIO, TX, T. J. WATSON, filed by MARCUS D. WRIGHT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Declaration in support and other supporting documents, #2 Envelope)(REO) Modified on 5/11/2021 (REO).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WRIGHT v. WATSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. PROSECUTOR OF SAN ANTONIO, TX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. J. WATSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARCUS D. WRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?