STANLEY v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner: ALLEN D. STANLEY
Respondent: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 2:2021cv00332
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Doris L Pryor
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Denying Motion for Cease and Desist Order and Granting Motion for Status - The motion for cease and desist order, dkt. #3 , is denied. The motion for status update, dkt. #6 , is granted. The clerk shall include a copy of the docket with Mr. Stanley's copy of this Order. Copies to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (KAA)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The petitioner has aptly presented his arguments in this case. These are not circumstances in which it is in the interest of justice to appoint counsel for the petitioner. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/21/2021. (KAA)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until November 23, 2021, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/12/2021.(KAA)
September 24, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Status Update re: #3 Motion for Cease and Desist Order and Copy Request, filed by Petitioner ALLEN D. STANLEY. Copy of Public Docket sheet sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Public Docket Sheet)(TPS)
September 13, 2021 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ALLEN D. STANLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA)
September 3, 2021 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS)
September 1, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Cease and Desist Order, filed by Petitioner ALLEN D. STANLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner ALLEN D. STANLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ALLEN D. STANLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(TPS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STANLEY v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ALLEN D. STANLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?