WILSON v. WARDEN
| JAMES WILSON |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2021cv00347 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re #9 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Petitioner JAMES WILSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TPS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Petitioner JAMES WILSON. (TPS) |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The petitioner has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee in this action. The petitioner shall have through December 1, 2021, to pay that sum to the Clerk of the District Court. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/2/2021. (TPS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner JAMES WILSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES WILSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Striking Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Setting Deadline to File Signed Petition - Mr. Wilson did not sign his petition. For this reason, it is STRICKEN. Mr. Wilson shall have through October 25, 2021, to file a signed petition. If Mr. Wilson fails to file a signed, coherent petition for writ of habeas corpus before October 25, 2021, this action will be dismissed.Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/24/2021.(TPS)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner DOC number updated for James Wilson from 438847 to 139229 based on the Indiana Department of Corrections website. (JRT) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES WILSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(KAA) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JAMES WILSON located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JAMES WILSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WILSON v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JAMES WILSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
