CROSBY v. BRADLEY
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Respondent: J. BRADLEY and USP - Terre Haute
Case Number: 2:2021cv00362
Filed: September 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME - granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Respondent shall have through December 13, 2021,in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) days after service of the answer in which to reply. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/8/2021. (KAA)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to December 13, 2021 , filed by Respondent J. BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Preston, Jeffrey)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey D. Preston on behalf of Respondent USP - Terre Haute. (Preston, Jeffrey)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until November 12, 2021, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/1/2021.(KAA)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Jeffrey Roy Crosby. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (KAA)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECEIPT #IP075879 for Filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Jeffrey Roy Crosby. (KAA)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. Copy mailed to petitioner. (KAA)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JEFFREY ROY CROSBY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Letter regarding filing fee, #4 Envelope)(KAA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CROSBY v. BRADLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. BRADLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USP - Terre Haute
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?