CLOWERS v. WATSON et al
| GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS |
| T.J. WATSON, A. FRENCH, B. CARSON, S. FLAURR and SIMS |
| 2:2021cv00402 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to withdraw his complaint without prejudice, dkt. #10 , is treated as a notice of dismissal. No judgment is required under these circumstances. The clerk is directed to terminate the motions at dkt. #9 and dkt. #10 and close this action on the docket. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/7/2021.(TPS)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Unrelated Emergency Complaint. Should Mr. Clowers wish to pursue claims related to the allegations in his motion, he may file a separate lawsuit after exhausting available administrative remedies. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/7/2021. (TPS)
|
| Filing 11 RECEIPT #IP076949 for civil filing fee in the amount of $350.00, paid by Plaintiff. (LMK) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Complaint without Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION Unrelated Emergency Complaint, filed by Plaintiff GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL - The Court finds that the plaintiff has not made a reasonable effort to recruit counsel on his own before seeking the Court's assistance. His motion for assistance with recruiting counsel, dkt. #7 , must therefore be denied without prejudice. The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form, which he must use if he chooses to renew his motion. Copies to plaintiff via US Mail l. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Counsel Form) (KAA)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Assistance to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifty-Eight Dollars and Thirty-Three Cents ($58.33). The plaintiff shall have through December 7, 2021, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/9/2021. (KAA)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B. CARSON, S. FLAURR, A. FRENCH, SIMS, T.J. WATSON, filed by GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
