HOUSLEY v. PLASSE et al
| MS. LATASHA HOUSLEY and LATASHA HOUSLEY |
| JOHN PLASSE, MR. TORIE SWITZER, MR. BRAD SUTER, JOHN DOE, TORIE SWITZER, BRAD SUTER and JOE DOES 1-50 |
| 2:2022cv00020 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendants JOE DOES 1-50, JOHN PLASSE, BRAD SUTER, TORIE SWITZER. (Friedrich, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David P. Friedrich on behalf of Defendants JOHN PLASSE, BRAD SUTER, TORIE SWITZER. (Friedrich, David) Modified on 2/22/2022 (KAA). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Russell Morris, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff LATASHA HOUSLEY. (Morris, William) |
| Filing 4 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (TPS) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JOE DOES 1-50, JOHN PLASSE, BRAD SUTER, TORIE SWITZER. (TPS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number BINSDC-6926672) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Morris, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
