D. et al v. SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD et al
B. D. and BRYAN MYERS |
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD and HOHM TECH, INC. |
2:2022cv00107 |
March 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff BRYAN MYERS. (Cross, William) |
Filing 20 Statement IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BRYAN MYERS. (Cross, William) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Gilbert, Ronald) |
Filing 18 DECLARATION OF WILLIAM CROSS IN SUPPORT re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion by B. D.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31)(Cross, William) |
Filing 17 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion by B. D.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix A, #2 Appendix Appendix B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 8)(Cross, William) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Plaintiff B. D.. (Cross, William) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney William H. Cross for B. D. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 5/10/2022. (RSF) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay pending resolution of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. #8 . The May 9, 2022 initial pretrial conference and all deadlines are VACATED. This matter is set for a telephonic status conference on October 12, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. (Eastern). Counsel shall attend the status conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 5/6/2022.(KAA) |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Final Adjudication of Personal Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cox, Dina) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Attorney(s) William H. Cross to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7090262), filed by Plaintiffs B. D., BRYAN MYERS. (Cross, William) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Local Rule 81-1 provides that within thirty days after the filing of the notice of removal, "every plaintiff who has not filed a motion to remand must file a statement responding to the notice of removal's allegations as to the citizenship of the parties and the amount in controversy." Plaintiff B.D., by and through his guardian ad litem, Bryan Myers, has not filed such a statement or a motion to remand. He is ordered to do so by no later than May 20, 2022. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 5/4/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD identifying Corporate Parent SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. for SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.. (Cox, Dina) |
Filing 9 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Heuiseob Shin)(Cox, Dina) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cox, Dina) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 5/9/2022 at 2:45 PM (Eastern Time) by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 3/30/2022.(KAA) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Gilbert, Ronald) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to HOHM TECH, INC., SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (RAGS) (TPS) |
Filing 4 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (TPS) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C. Gilbert, III on behalf of Defendant SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Gilbert, Ronald) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Knox Circuit Court, case number 42C01-2108-CT-000021, filed by SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7023724) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 State Court Record Complaint, Appearance, Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Verified Petition for Temporary Admission, Order on Verified Petition for Temporary Admission, Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant, Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Time, Order Granting Motion for Time, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gilbert, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.