LEWIS v. RAY et al
| JONATHAN LEWIS |
| CODY RAY and KOLHOUSE |
| 2:2022cv00108 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through May 12, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Form motion for IFP) (MEH) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JONATHAN LEWIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (KAA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KOLHOUSE, CODY RAY, filed by JONATHAN LEWIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
