UTLEY v. HENDRIX et al
| JAMES K. UTLEY |
| JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATTHEW LEAHR, JERRY SNYDER, RANDALL PURCELL, ASHLYNN GONTHIER, S. VANSCHAYCK and B. LALOUX |
| 2:2022cv00158 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RECEIPT #339 for partial filing fee in the amount of $47.00, paid by JAMES UTLEY. (DJH) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Court Assistance to the extent this Order provides him with information regarding payment of the filing fee and service of process. The plaintiff has through June 13, 2022, in which to pay the remaining filing fee balance of $47.00 or to move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attach a copy of the transactions associated with his trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/6/2022. (TPS)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE Regarding Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff JAMES K. UTLEY (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (TPS) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON FILING FEE - On May 12, 2022, Mr. Utley paid $355.00 toward the filing fee. Dkt. 7 . He shall have through June 13, 2022, in which to pay the remaining balance of $47.00 or to move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attach a copy of the transactions associated with his trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/18/2022.(TPS)
|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP079125 for partial filing fee in the amount of $355.00, paid by JAMES UTLEY. (DJH) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through May 31, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Attachments: #1 Form motion for IFP) (MEH) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JAMES K. UTLEY. (AAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Court's Assistance, filed by Plaintiff JAMES K. UTLEY. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (KAA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KEVIN GILMORE, ASHLYNN GONTHIER, JACK HENDRIX, B. LALOUX, MATTHEW LEAHR, RANDALL PURCELL, JERRY SNYDER, FRANK VANIHEL, S. VANSCHAYCK, filed by JAMES K. UTLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
