KIDD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| CARLOS KIDD |
| THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2022cv00194 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause, filed by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of R. Grundy, #2 Attachment 1 - SENTRY Inmate Profile, #3 Attachment 2 - Indictment, Northern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 5-05-cr-117-H, #4 Attachment 3 - USMS Prisoner Tracking System, #5 Attachment 4 - Judgment in a Criminal Case, Northern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 5-05-cr-117, #6 Attachment 5 - TDCJ Offender Information Details, #7 Attachment 6 - Superseding Indictment, District of North Dakota, Case No. 1:12-cr-190, #8 Attachment 7 - Judgment in a Criminal Case, District of North Dakota, Case No. 1:12-cr-190)., #9 Attachment 8 - Petitioner's letter dated June 5, 2015, #10 Attachment 9 - Letter to Judge Robinson dated August 20, 2015, #11 Attachment 10 - Letter to Petitioner dated October 19, 2015, #12 Attachment 11 - TDCJ Certificate of Parole, #13 Attachment 12 - SENTRY Public Information Inmate Data)(Preston, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey D. Preston on behalf of Respondent THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Preston, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until July 1, 2022, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Copy sent to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/23/2022.(TPS)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner CARLOS KIDD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(TPS)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CARLOS KIDD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(TPS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KIDD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CARLOS KIDD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Preston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
