BURNETT v. VANIHEL et al
Plaintiff: DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant: VANIHEL, ANDREA MASON, A. MCLAUGHLIN, C. COAKLEY, SIMS, MRAZIK and M. LEOHR
Case Number: 2:2022cv00230
Filed: June 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Granting Motion to Amend Complaint and Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - Plaintiff Daryl Burnett's motion to amend complaint, dkt. #8 , is granted to the extent that his Amended Complaint, dkt. #9 , is deemed timely filed. Mr. Burnett's second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #11 , is denied as moot because Mr. Burnett has already been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Dkt. #6 . Mr. Burnett's amended complaint will be screened in due course. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/29/2022. (KAA)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/21/2022. (TPS)
June 20, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB)
June 20, 2022 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB)
June 20, 2022 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against C. COAKLEY, M. LEOHR, ANDREA MASON, A. MCLAUGHLIN, MRAZIK, SIMS, VANIHEL, filed by DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB)
June 20, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (AAS)
June 20, 2022 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (AAS)
June 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH)
June 13, 2022 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS)
June 13, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TPS)
June 13, 2022 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TPS)
June 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C. COAKLEY, M. LEOHR, ANDREA MASON, A. MCLAUGHLIN, MRAZIK, SIMS, VANIHEL, filed by DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TPS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BURNETT v. VANIHEL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VANIHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREA MASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. MCLAUGHLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. COAKLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SIMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MRAZIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. LEOHR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?