GRAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| CHRISTOPHER GRAY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2022cv00264 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to October 17, 2022 , filed by Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Reitz on behalf of Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Reitz, Brian) |
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until August 17, 2022, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/13/2022.(KAA)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Robert L. Siranni, Jr for CHRISTOPHER GRAY added. Copy sent to Attorney Sirianni via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 7/8/2022. (TPS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The Court finds that Counsel Plaintiff has shown good cause and dissolves the Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 7/8/2022.(NAD)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #5 Order to Show Cause, filed by CHRISTOPHER GRAY.. (Sirianni, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Attorney Sirianni is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 7 days of this Order as to why this Court should not deny his Motion for the failure to disclose this discipline. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 7/7/2022.(KAA)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Attorney(s) Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7172391), filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Sirianni, Robert) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT of #1 Petition, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER GRAY. (Sirianni, Robert) Modified on 7/5/2022 (KAA). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by CHRISTOPHER GRAY. (Filing fee $5, receipt number AINSDC-7172303) (Sirianni, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER GRAY | |
| Represented By: | Robert L Sirianni, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Brian L. Reitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
