ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| 2:2022cv00345 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Dkt. #8 resent to George Alexander Acevedo at Correctional Industrial Facility based on the IDOC website. (JRT) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as undeliverable - Out to Court. #8 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO (PENDLETON - CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITYCORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY). (KAA) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as undeliverable - Offender No Longer at Putnamville. #8 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO. (Remailed to Pendleton CF (KAA). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 7 Address updated for GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO from Putnamville Correctional Facility to Correctional Industrial Facility based on the IDOC website. Dkts. #1 , #2 , 3 , #4 and #5 resent to GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO at Correctional Industrial Facility. (JRT). |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable - No longer at PUTNAMVILLE CF. 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint, #4 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, #1 Consent to Prisoner E-Service sent to GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO. (KAA) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Signed Complaint and Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis without Prejudice - The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt 3 , is denied. Mr. Acevedo has through September 16, 2022, to file a signed complaint and renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the last six months. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Acevedo a complaint form with his copy of this Order. The failure to act by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. (SEE ORDER.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Blank Complaint Form) (TPS) Modified on 8/17/2022 to update docket text (TPS).
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, filed by GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO. (No fee paid with this filing) (KAA) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
