GOLLIDAY v. LEWIS et al
TERRYON GOLLIDAY |
MICHAEL J. LEWIS, DOUGLAS G. CARTER, ROBERT ROBERTS, TERRY MODESITT, REMA SULIEMAN, JASON SAUNDERS, ADRIENNE MELRING, CYNTHIA A. FISHER, MICHAEL WRIGHT, EDWARD MCGLONE, EDWARD DWYER, GRETCHEN ETLING, JESSICA WALKER, JIMMIE RICHARDSON and JOHN PLASSE |
2:2022cv00398 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Order Directing Plaintiff's Custodian to Forward Certified Copy of Plaintiff's Six-Month Trust Account Statement - In his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he asserts jail staff has denied his requests for his account information at least fifteen times. Dkt. #5 . The Court hereby ORDERS Captain Charley Funk or his designee at the Vigo County Jail to provide the Court with a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust account statement or Vigo County Jail's institutional equivalent for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on September 12, 2022, and to do so no later than Tuesday, November 25, 2022. Copies mailed pursuant to Distribution. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/25/2022.(KAA) |
Filing 9 MOTION for the Court Information, filed by Plaintiff TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Court Court Intervention, filed by Plaintiff TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Gag Order, filed by Plaintiff TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Information, filed by Plaintiff TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as undeliverable: DAMAGED re #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (TPS) Modified on 9/28/2022 - RESENT DKT 2 TO TERRYON GOLLIDAY (MEH). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through October 24, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOUGLAS G. CARTER, EDWARD DWYER, GRETCHEN ETLING, CYNTHIA A. FISHER, MICHAEL J. LEWIS, EDWARD MCGLONE, ADRIENNE MELRING, TERRY MODESITT, JOHN PLASSE, JIMMIE RICHARDSON, ROBERT ROBERTS, JASON SAUNDERS, REMA SULIEMAN, JESSICA WALKER, MICHAEL WRIGHT, filed by TERRYON GOLLIDAY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.