KINSLOW v. WARDEN
Petitioner: KYLA KINSLOW
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 2:2022cv00480
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
2 Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (2:22-cv-00480-JPH-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CJD)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by WARDEN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 1/23/2023. (Sullivan, Erica)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica Sue Sullivan on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Sullivan, Erica)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by KYLA KINSLOW. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 12/12/2022. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/31/2022.(TPS)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00459. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter from Kyla Kinslow forwarded from the Southern District of Indiana (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (nae) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 10/27/2022.]
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER transferring case to the USDC of Southern Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(rmf) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 10/27/2022.]
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00, Receipt #3029231), filed by Kyla Kinslow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Kinslow)(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 10/27/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KINSLOW v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KYLA KINSLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Represented By: Erica Sue Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?