TAYLOR v. SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS et al
CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR |
SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD, CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK and SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTIC INC. d/b/a Siemens Healthineers |
2:2022cv00508 |
November 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
M Kendra Klump |
Doris L Pryor |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #30 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Against the Individual Defendants , filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, LINDA WOOD. (Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 30 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Against the Individual Defendants, filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, LINDA WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Against the Individual Defendants)(Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 29 Defendant's ANSWER to #27 Amended Complaint for Employment Discrimination, filed by SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTIC INC..(Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 28 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT - Mr. Taylor has now filed a timely and proper amended complaint. Dkt. #27 . Therefore, defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Dkt. #16 . See Order. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/10/2023. (KAA) |
Filing 27 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR.(JDC) |
Filing 26 ORDER - For the reasons set forth in their motion, the Court GRANTS Defendants' "Motion for Clarification," dkt. #25 , to the extent Defendants shall have until April 21, 2023, to file any reply in support of their pending motion to dismiss, dkt. 16. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/30/23. (JRB) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Clarification Regarding Document Nos. 23 and 24, filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTIC INC., LINDA WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Clarification)(Mohler, Michael) |
Filing 24 ORDER - denying #22 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; Plaintiff, Clifford Taylor, brings this lawsuit against his former employer and two of its employees, alleging that he was fired because of his religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Mr. Taylor has filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 22. This motion--filed 17 days after Defendants' motion to dismiss--would normally be granted as a matter of course. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) (providing that a party may amend its pleading once "as a matter of course within" "21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)"). However, Mr. Taylor's motion, dkt. 22, is DENIED as presented. the Clerk is directed to enclose a blank copy of the Court's form "Complaint for Employment Discrimination"--the same document that Mr. Taylor originally filled out as his complaint. See dkt. 1. If Mr. Taylor seeks to file an amended complaint, he should do so on this form. Any corrections that Mr. Taylor wishes to make should be incorporated in this amended complaint, mindful that that document would be the operative pleading in the case. Mr. Taylor shall have until April 14, 2023, to file this amended complaint. Mindful of the leniency given to pro se plaintiffs and given that Mr. Taylor attempted to file his amended complaint within the time that leave should be freely given, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), the Court intends to give leave for Mr. Taylor to file his amended complaint, assuming it is timely and proper. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/27/2023. Copies Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE re #16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR. (JDC) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR. (JDC) |
Filing 21 ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS - In the event an agreed protective order is required in this matter, the parties shall file a motion seeking the entry of such an order, attaching thereto the proposed protective order: (SEE ORDER). Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/20/2023.(TPS) |
Filing 20 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES - Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) and S.D. Ind. L.R. 37-1(a), a party must confer in good faith to resolve a discovery dispute with another person or party before involving the court in the dispute. If the party has exhausted those efforts without resolving the dispute they must seek a discovery conference with the Magistrate Judge before the filing of a formal motion to compel or contested motion for protective order in the manner set forth: (SEE ORDER). Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/20/2023.(TPS) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER for Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference held before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/20/2023. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/18/2023 at 3:30 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. See Minute Order for extended deadlines and further information. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. (BAS) |
Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND APPEARANCE AND CAPTION TO REFLECT PROPER NAME OF DEFENDANT - granting #15 Motion to Amend Appearance and Caption to Reflect Proper Name of Defendant. The Clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that Defendant Siemens Healthineers should be "Siemens Healthcare Diagnostic Inc. d/b/a Siemens Healthineers." Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/10/2023. (KAA) |
Filing 17 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Complaint and Determination and Notice of Rights)(Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Amend/Correct Appearance and Caption to Reflect Proper Name of Defendant, filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Appearance Theresa R. Parish, #2 Exhibit Amended Appearance Michael Mohler, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 14 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER - Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/20/2023 at 02:00 PM (Eastern Time) in before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. The Parties shall attend the conference by calling 877-336-1274, access code 4665453, Security Code 220508. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 2/22/2023.(TPS) |
Filing 13 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS. (Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, LINDA WOOD, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS. All Defendants. (Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Carl Mohler on behalf of Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (Mohler, Michael) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Theresa Renee Parish on behalf of Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (Parish, Theresa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon: 1) SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS; 2) LINDA WOOD; and 3) CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK. (KAA) |
Filing 8 ORDER - Mr. Taylor's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #6 , is GRANTED. While in forma pauperis status allows Mr. Taylor to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, he remains liable for the full fees. No payment is due at this time. The clerk is directed to issue process to Defendants. Copies mailed per Distribution. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/6/2023. (KAA) |
Filing 7 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (2:22-cv-00508-JPH-MKK), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
Filing 5 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (2:22-cv-00508-JPH-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CJD) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Clifford Taylor has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , which is missing its second page. The motion is DENIED as it does not contain the necessary income-related information. Mr. Taylor may file a renewed motion, which must include the entirety of the attached form, by December 19, 2022. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Motion for IFP Form) (KAA) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Defendants CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD. (TPS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHRISTOPHER HAMALAK, SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS, LINDA WOOD, filed by CLIFFORD L. TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.