SEIBEL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
| ERIC M. SEIBEL |
| KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and ALEX SMITH |
| 2:2022cv00516 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER on Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dkts. #3 and #9 , are granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Five Dollars and Twenty-Four Cents ($5.24). The plaintiff shall have through January 17, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/19/2022. (TPS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ERIC M. SEIBEL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Resubmission of Existing E-Consent)(AAS) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL - Mr. Seibel's motion for assistance recruiting counsel, dkt. #4 , is denied without prejudice. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Seibel a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Counsel Form) (KAA)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through December 19, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff ERIC M. SEIBEL. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ERIC M. SEIBEL. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ALEX SMITH, filed by ERIC M. SEIBEL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KAA) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ERIC M. SEIBEL located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ERIC M. SEIBEL to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
