MICKLES v. INTERNATIONAL -CUSTOMS FEDERICO DEGETAU et al
TERRELL MICKLES |
INTERNATIONAL -CUSTOMS FEDERICO DEGETAU, TAX DIVISION OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, MONGOLA, CHINA, WESTMINDE, LONDON and JOHANESSBURG, SOUTH AFRICA |
2:2022cv00521 |
November 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 58 - Having this day directed the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/2/2022.(TPS) |
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The Court thus DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Final judgment will issue in a separate entry. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/2/2022.(TPS) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INTERNATIONAL -CUSTOMS FEDERICO DEGETAU, JOHANESSBURG, SOUTH AFRICA, MONGOLA, CHINA, TAX DIVISION OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, WESTMINDE, LONDON, filed by TERRELL MICKLES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.