WATERMAN v. KEEN et al
| CRAIG WATERMAN |
| CHIEF SHAWN KEEN, SERGEANT JUSTIN SEARS, OFFICER ALAN JAMES and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER JONES |
| 2:2022cv00541 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Austin Andreas hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Andreas, Austin) |
| Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by All Defendants.(Hassler, Mark) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Douglas Hassler on behalf of Defendants ALAN JAMES, CHRISTOPHER JONES, SHAWN KEEN, JUSTIN SEARS. (Hassler, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vigo Superior, case number 84D03-2210-CT-006778, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7388388) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, Summons, Appearance, Notice of Enlargement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hassler, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
