JOHNSON, SR v. SCHAEFFER et al
RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR |
S. SCHAEFFER and MARSHEL |
2:2022cv00570 |
December 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Order Granting Motion to Add Request for Relief - Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to clarify that he seeks $120,000 in this lawsuit. That motion, dkt. #6 , is GRANTED. The Court will construe this request as a supplement to Plaintiff's complaint. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/3/2023. (KAA) |
Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER PAYMENT - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted through the assessment of an initial partial filing fee. That sum has been paid. However, plaintiff is still obligated to pay the remainder of the three hundred and fifty dollars ($350.00) filing fee. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR, 911652, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court. As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $342.97. Copy to plaintiff and Warden via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 2/1/2023.(KAA) |
Filing 12 ORDER denying #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File as unnecessary because Plaintiff has timely paid the fee. Plaintiff's complaint will be screened in due course. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/24/2023. (TPS) |
Filing 11 RECEIPT #3460 for partial filing fee in the amount of $7.03, paid by RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR.. (DJH) |
Filing 10 Letter to the Court from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time for payment of partial filing fee, filed by Plaintiff RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Seven Dollars and Three Cents ($7.03). The plaintiff shall have through January 23, 2023, to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/20/2022. (TPS) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Add Compensation Amount, filed by Plaintiff RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (TPS) |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (KAA) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address for RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (KAA) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(KAA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARSHEL, S. SCHAEFFER, filed by RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.